Receive No Monetary Benefit From Mumbai Indians: Sachin Tendulkar's Letter To Ombudsman

Updated: 28 April 2019 14:17 IST

Sachin Tendulkar on Sunday filed a 14-point written response to a notice sent by Ombudsman cum Ethics Officer Justice (Retd) DK Jain.

Receive No Monetary Benefit From Mumbai Indians: Sachin Tendulkar
Sachin Tendulkar has refuted all allegations of 'conflict of interest' levelled against him. © BCCI/IPL

Sachin Tendulkar has categorically refuted all allegations of 'conflict of interest' levelled against him as he claimed to have neither "received any compensation" nor held any decision making role in the IPL franchise Mumbai Indians. Tendulkar on Sunday filed a 14-point written response to a notice sent by Ombudsman cum Ethics Officer Justice (Retd) DK Jain. It was with regards to a 'conflict of interest' complaint filed by the Madhya Pradesh Cricket Association (MPCA) member Sanjeev Gupta. As per the complainant, Tendulkar and VVS Laxman are allegedly performing dual roles, first of a "support staff" in their respective IPL franchises Mumbai Indians (MI) and SunRisers Hyderabad (SRH), and second as members of the Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC).

"At the outset, the Noticee (Tendulkar) denies the contents of the Complaint in totality (except the statements specifically admitted herein). No part of the Complaint should be deemed to be admitted by the Noticee for lack of specific denials," Tendulkar wrote in his response which is in possession of PTI.

Since Sanjeev Gupta's complaints specifically mentioned Sachin Tendulkar's role with the Mumbai Indians, the iconic cricketer in his response has made a full disclosure of his role in the franchise.

"The Noticee (Tendulkar) has received no pecuniary benefit/compensation from the Mumbai Indians IPL Franchise in his capacity as the Mumbai Indians 'ICON' since his retirement, and is certainly not employed with the Franchise in any capacity."

"He does not occupy any position, nor has he taken any decision (including selection of team players) which could qualify as being in governance or management of the Franchise. Accordingly, there is no conflict of interest, either under the BCCI Rules or otherwise," world's leading run-getter further explained.

As far as his role in the CAC is concerned, Tendulkar mentioned that he was appointed as a member of the BCCI committee in 2015, which was years after his involvement with the MI.

"The Noticee was appointed to the panel of the Cricket Advisory Committee ("CAC") in the year 2015. The Hon'ble Ethics Officer will appreciate that the Noticee was named as the 'ICON' for Mumbai Indians much prior to his empanelment with the CAC - which fact has always been in the public domain."

"Accordingly, the BCCI aware of the Noticee's association with the Mumbai Indians Franchise at the time of his appointment to the CAC."

Tendulkar, in his disclosure, further makes it clear that the role of an icon -- the one he is performing right now in the IPL franchise team -- in no way is a position either in the management or the governance of the franchise.

"The Complaint wrongly assumes that the Noticee's association with the Mumbai Indians IPL Franchise ("Franchise") is in the capacity of "governance", "management" or "employment" - thereby attracting a conflict under Rule 38 (4).

"His role is limited to providing guidance to the Franchise team by sharing his insights, learnings and working closely with the younger members in the team to help them realise their true potential."

In his reply to Sanjeev Gupta's question of him sitting in the team's 'dugout' -- place specified for players and support staff only -- he termed the allegation as "absurd".

"A mentor cannot be qualified as "management" of the Franchise. If the Complainant's absurd logic were to be applied, a physiotherapist, trainer or a masseur would also be qualified as "management" of the Franchise," Tendulkar responded, making it clear that he is answerable to none of the support staff.

"It is also pertinent to note that the Mumbai Indians team has a head coach, who works side by side with coaches for specific disciplines such as bowling, batting etc. in ultimate coordination with the Director of Cricket Operations - none of whom the Noticee is answerable to or vice versa since his role is limited to that of providing guidance and motivation to the team."

Also, in case of the Ombudsman willing to "continue proceedings", Tendulkar has requested for a "personal hearing along with his legal representatives".

Comments
Topics mentioned in this article India India Cricket Team Mumbai Indians Mumbai Indians Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar Sachin Tendulkar VVS Laxman Cricket
Highlights
  • Sachin Tendulkar refutes allegations of 'conflict of interest'
  • Tendulkar filed a 14-point written response to a notice sent by Ombudsman
  • Tendulkar said he has never received any compensation from Mumbai Indians
Related Articles
Sachin Tendulkar "Humbled" After Induction Into ICC Hall Of Fame
Sachin Tendulkar "Humbled" After Induction Into ICC Hall Of Fame
Sachin Tendulkar, Allan Donald Inducted Into ICC Hall Of Fame
Sachin Tendulkar, Allan Donald Inducted Into ICC Hall Of Fame
Sachin Tendulkar Suggests Alternative Rule To Decide Winner After Super Over Tie
Sachin Tendulkar Suggests Alternative Rule To Decide Winner After Super Over Tie
Sachin Tendulkar Pays Tribute To Ramakant Achrekar On Guru Purnima
Sachin Tendulkar Pays Tribute To Ramakant Achrekar On Guru Purnima
"MS Dhoni Coming In At No. 5 Would
"MS Dhoni Coming In At No. 5 Would've Made A Difference": Sachin Tendulkar After India's World Cup Exit
Advertisement