If President Of India Can Be Over 70, Why Not BCCI Officials, Asks 'Disqualified' Niranjan Shah
Niranjan Shah, who breaks the 70-year cap set for BCCI officials, was made part of a committee to challenge the rulings.
Niranjan Shah, one of the many Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) officials who is facing disqualification from holding any office, has questioned the Supreme Court-appointed Lodha Committee recommendations, asking if the President of India can function beyond 70 years of age, why couldn't the BCCI president. Shah, 73, who is a former president of the Saurashtra Cricket Association (SCA) also faces the brunt of the 'one state, once vote' ruling. He was on Wednesday included in the committee set up by the BCCI to see which of the Lodha recommendation could be implemented.
"If the Indian President can be well over 70 years of age, why can't the BCCI administrators work beyond that that age limit," argued the 'disqualified' Shah.
Shah will be a 'special invitee' along with the seven members, providing his "inputs and suggestions" to help the other committee members.
"I don't understand this hue and cry over the age limit of the BCCI office-bearers. If our president (Pranab Mukherjee, who is 81) can work beyond 70, what is so wrong about BCCI officials working beyond that age limit.
"As long as you are fit, you can work even till the time you are alive. I call this age discrimination (what is being proposed by the Lodha panel)," Shah told PTI.
Shah is in the Sourav Ganguly-led Special Panel even though the Lodha recommendations render him ineligible to be a state or BCCI administrator on all counts.
"I think my experience will come handy in the panel as we have discussed the recommendations at length during the BCCI SGM. Though all members will have a say," he said further with the panel's first meeting to study Lodha reforms scheduled in New Delhi on Saturday.
Shah, incidentally, had been president of the SCA for over four decades.
Shah not only has objection to the proposed 70-year age cap, his biggest issue is with one-state one vote which directly impacts SCA.
"Personally I am not against the one-state one-vote. But how can you take away the voting rights of one of the oldest state associations in the country. The same applies for Mumbai cricket. They have done so much for Indian cricket.
"We have no problems with voting rights given to a new member but voting rights of West Zone should stay as it is a major contributor," said Shah.
Another contentious clause, according to Shah, is the three-year cooling off period between two terms and a cumulative period of nine years.
"What is the point of having a cooling off period? If I am joint secretary for three years, I should be eligible to be a secretary in the next term as it would ensure seamless transition and maintain continuity," he said.
Shah is hopeful that Supreme Court will consider reviewing the reforms.
"We are hopeful that the interim applications filed by 18 state associations can lead to a positive outcome," he added,
(With PTI Inputs)