BCCI Slammed, Youngsters Wanting to be Dhonis And Kohlis Not Getting Chance: Supreme Court
BCCI's resistance resistance to implementing the recommendations of Justice R M Lodha committee favouring large-scale structural reforms was also brought up with the Supreme Court appointing senior advocate Gopal Subramanium as amicus curiae
- Press Trust of India
- Updated: April 25, 2016 10:11 PM IST
![BCCI Slammed, Youngsters Wanting to be Dhonis And Kohlis Not Getting Chance: Supreme Court](https://s.ndtvimg.com/images/content/2016/apr/806/virat-kohli-ms-dhoni-2304.jpg)
Highlights
-
SC slammed BCCI for monopolising cricket
-
SC also appointed senior advocate Gopal Subramanium as amicus curiae
-
SC also pulled up BCCI for resisting the Lodha panel recommendations
The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for "monopolising" cricket in the country and said several youngsters wanting to be Dhonis and Kohlis are not given equal opportunity if they are not on the right side of the cricket body.
"Several youngsters in the country want to make their career in cricket and want to be Dhonis and Kohlis due to the glamour and glitz associated with it. They do not get equal opportunity if they are not on the right side of the BCCI. Sometimes they are prevented by the people at the helm of affairs," a bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur said.
The apex court also appointed senior advocate Gopal Subramanium as amicus curiae in the matter and sought his assistance to explore as to how the recommendations of Justice R M Lodha committee favouring large-scale structural reforms, which BCCI and other boards have been resisting, could be implemented.
The bench, also comprising Justice F M I Kalifulla, expressed anguish over the cricket body running a "prohibitory regime and monopolising cricket" across the country, saying no one can play the game without its nod.
"You (BCCI) are running a prohibitory regime which is spread across the country. If a player has to play cricket he has to be with you. You have complete monopoly. You have monopoly over members and you prevent people from becoming members.
"Suppose a state from North East wants to be a member in BCCI. You are not allowing it to become a member because your writ lies there also. You don't want to give them equal opportunity. You have complete monopoly over Team India because you select them and don't want to give the right to anyone else. We need to balance things," the bench said.
The court said it fails to understand why there should be any problem to anyone because Justice R M Lodha-led committee has opened the membership to other states and recommended one state-one vote.
The bench made it clear to Tamil Nadu Cricket Association (TNCA), which has expressed its reservations to one state-one vote formula, that it is not concerned with any state associations.
"We make it clear that we are not concerned with any state cricket associations but if they want to associate with BCCI, then they have to reform themselves. You will have to fall in line and reform yourselves or you will lose your membership," the bench said.