N. Srinivasan Agrees to Keep Away From IPL, Seeks Supreme Court Nod for BCCI
Appearing before a bench headed by Justice TS Thakur, senior advocate Kapil Sibal said that his client N. Srinivasan is giving an undertaking that he will keep himself disassociated with the IPL matters till he is given a clean chit by a proposed high-powered panel.
- Indo-Asian News Service
- Updated: December 10, 2014 05:01 pm IST
Board of Control for Cricket in India's president-in-exile N. Srinivasan on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that if he is re-elected, he would stay away from the Indian Premier League (IPL) governing council till a proposed committee decides on the larger question of conflict of between his BCCI role and his IPL franchise Chennai Super Kings. (BCCI Opposes Supreme Court Appointed Committee)
Responding to a poser from the court on Tuesday, senior counsel Kapil Sibal told a bench of Justice T.S. Thakur and Justice F.M.I. Kalifulla that Srinivasan would stay away from the governing council and its activities and also from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) meetings related to the IPL. (Supreme Court Directs BCCI to Postpone Elections till End of January)
Sibal said: "Mr. N. Srinivasan, further undertakes that if he is elected as president of BCCI, till the (proposed) committee suggests the procedure to deal with the issue of conflict of interest, he will not attend any IPL governing council meeting or any other IPL related discussion in any meeting of working committee or general body meeting of the BCCI." (Supreme Court Tells Srinivasan to Maintain Distance From BCCI Working Committee)
This the court was told in a note on the scope of reference of the committee to be appointed by the apex court or the BCCI into the question of conflict of interest. The note said the committee could suggest "the sanctions to be imposed, in accordance with the applicable IPL rules on person prima facie found to be involved in the act of backing by the Mudgal Committee." (Court Wants BCCI to Take Action Against Meiyappan)
The committee may also determine the liability of the franchisees for the act of backing by their "team officials and to suggest the consequential sanctions that can be imposed on them in accordance with the IPL rules." (Gavaskar, Ganguly, Shastri also have dual roles: Srinivasan to Supreme Court)
The note said that another term of reference for the proposed committee would be to "consider and suggest a mechanism to identify the potential conflict of interest in the BCCI and to suggest the procedure to be adopted for dealing with situations of potential conflict of interest." (India Cements shares sinks due to IPL scam)
Sibal said this during the hearing on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by Cricket Association of Bihar which has sought to oust Srinivasan as BCCI president on the ground of his being in the conflict of interest situation being the president of the cricketing body and also the owner of CSK.
The PIL is also seeking the cancellation of IPL franchisee CSK on the ground of Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan's alleged involvement in betting.