Pele Sues Samsung Over Improper Use of Image in Newspaper Advertisement
According to the complaint filed, Samsung placed the October ad for ultra high-definition televisions after breaking off negotiations in 2013 to use Pele's identity to promote its products.
- Reuters
- Updated: March 30, 2016 11:50 am IST
Highlights
-
Pele has sued Samsung Electronics Co for at least USD 30 million
-
Allegations are that the company improperly used a look-alike in an ad
-
According to complaint, the ad ran in New York Times without permission
Brazilian football legend Pele has sued Samsung Electronics Co for at least USD 30 million, alleging the Korean company improperly used a look-alike in an advertisement that ran in the New York Times without permission. (World's First Pele Shrine Shines in War-Torn Ukraine)
According to the complaint filed this month in federal court in Chicago, Samsung placed the October ad for ultra high-definition televisions after breaking off negotiations in 2013 to use Pele's identity to promote its products. (Pele To Auction Off Medals, Trophies and 1000-Goal Crown)
Pele, 75, whose given name is Edson Arantes do Nascimento, is widely regarded as the greatest football player ever and among the world's most famous athletes.
Although the ad does not mention Pele, it includes a portrait-sized image of a man who "very closely resembles" him, and a small photo of a football player making a "modified bicycle or scissors-kick, perfected and famously used by Pele," the complaint said.
Pele relies on endorsements for much of his income, and the ad will hurt the value of his endorsement rights and confuse consumers into believing he endorses Samsung products, the complaint added.
"The goal is to obtain fair compensation for the unauthorised use of Pele's identity, and to prevent future unauthorised uses," Pele's lawyer, Frederick Sperling, said in a phone interview.
Samsung spokeswoman Danielle Meister Cohen declined to comment.
The lawsuit was filed by Pele IP Ownership LLC, which owns Pele's trademark and publicity rights. It is dated March 16.
Sperling has also represented former Chicago Bulls star Michael Jordan, and helped him win a USD 8.9 million jury verdict last August against the former Dominick's Finer Foods over the grocer's unauthorised use of the basketball Hall of Famer's identity in an ad in Sports Illustrated.
Jordan later settled for an undisclosed amount.