Anurag Thakur-Led BCCI, Ratnakar Shetty Pushed To Backfoot By Supreme Court

Updated: 17 October 2016 20:54 IST

The Supreme Court had directed Anurag Thakur to file an affidavit and clarify whether he had asked the International Cricket Council (ICC) to write that Lodha recommendations amounted to government interference

Anurag Thakur-Led BCCI, Ratnakar Shetty Pushed To Backfoot By Supreme Court
SC on Monday reserved its order after Anurag Thakur-led BCCI sought more time to implement Lodha reforms. © AFP

New Delhi: A "defiant" and "obstructionist" BCCI was on Monday pushed to the backfoot by Supreme Court, which said its President Anurag Thakur and veteran official Ratnakar Shetty were "at odds" on the allegation that ICC's indulgence was sought to state that implementation of Lodha panel's recommendations and apex court directions tantamounted to government interference in its working.

"Thakur admits that he had asked International Cricket Council (ICC) chairperson (Shashank Manohar) for a letter while Ratnakar Shetty's affidavit says he had not asked. Shetty's affidavit filed earlier is at odds with that of Anurag Thakur," a bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud observed.

The bench, which reserved its order on the likely directions to be passed to the BCCI on implementation of the Lodha Committee recommendation for massive structural reform in the cash-rich sports body, took strong exception on the conflicting stand of Thakur and Shetty, General Manager (Cricket Operation), who were asked to file personal affidavits on October 7.

They were asked to explain the allegation that ICC CEO Dave Richardson was asked by BCCI to issue a letter that Lodha panel's directions tantamounted to government interference. Pushing both the cricket administrators to a sticky wicket, the bench wondered "Whether an attempt was made to secure a letter from ICC to state that the presence of CAG nominee in the apex council would tantamount to government interference in the BCCI working.

"If this was so, can it be meant to say that it was an attempt not to comply with the recommendations of the Lodha committee and the Supreme Court judgement by stating that ICC is threatening to strip the membership of BCCI," the bench said after perusing their affidavits and submission made by senior advocate Gopal Subramanian, who is assisting the court as amicus curiae in the matter.

"Do we go into inquiry and go to the bottom of it? At every stage, there appears to be defiance and obstructionist approach", the bench said.

Defending the two cricket administrators, senior advocate Kapil Sibal said "BCCI is being portrayed as a villain. It's like all wrong things are happening due to BCCI". "The remedy sought by Amicus Curiae will be worst than the disease," Sibal said, adding that BCCI does not want to show wilfull defiance. 

The apex court, which was also told that the interview of ICC CEO on the issue of letter being sought by BCCI on Lodha recommendation, was on the website, said "Dave Richardson, ICC CEO, is a senior person and you are accusing him of making false statement, when the BCCI President is asking to issue a letter that inclusion of CAG nominee in the apex council amount to government interference in the working of the BCCI".

The bench noted that Thakur in his affidavit had made a referrence that Manohar had expressed his views that appointment of CAG nominee in the apex council would amount to governmental interference before that stand was rejected by the apex court in July 18 verdict.

"What Manohar had said is perfectly in order as once the judgement was passed rejecting the contention that nominee of CAG would tantamount to government interference there was an appointment in this regard," the bench said.

It also warned if there was a false statement given by BCCI office bearers on affidavit, then perjury or contempt proceedings could be initiated.

The day's hearing began with the perusal of Thakur's and Shetty's affidavits in which the former had also stated that he had taken part in a recent ICC meeting where he had pointed out to ICC Chairman Shashank Manohar that he, as the then BCCI President, had taken a view that Lodha panel recommendation on appointment of a CAG nominee in the apex council would amount to governmental interference and may invoke action of suspension of the Board from the ICC.

"I, therefore, requested him that he being the ICC chairman, can a letter be issued clarifying the position which he had taken as BCCI President," the affidavit of Thakur said.

"Manohar explained to me at the meeting that when the stand was taken by him (as the then BCCI chief), the matter was pending before this court and had not been decided," the BCCI president said.

The affidavit further said the apex court had later rejected BCCI's contention that the appointment of CAG nominee in the council would amount to governmental interference.
 

Comments
Topics mentioned in this article BCCI , 1900-01-01 , Cricket , 1900-01-01 ,
Highlights
  • BCCI has so far cherry-picked reforms suggested by the Lodha committee
  • Thakur said state units are confused about some of the suggestions
  • BCCI has been reluctant to enforce Lodha panel reforms
Related Articles
"Privilege And Honour," Says Ravi Shastri After Reappointment As India Coach
"Privilege And Honour," Says Ravi Shastri After Reappointment As India Coach
"Why This Farce": BCCI Savagely Trolled After Ravi Shastri
"Why This Farce": BCCI Savagely Trolled After Ravi Shastri's Reappointment As India Coach
"Hassen, Who?": Fans Troll Cricketing Advisory Committee After Spelling Gaffe
"Hassen, Who?": Fans Troll Cricketing Advisory Committee After Spelling Gaffe
Kapil Dev Says CAC Must Have Say In Selection Of Support Staff
Kapil Dev Says CAC Must Have Say In Selection Of Support Staff
BCCI Goes Back On Its Decision, Keeps Administrative Manager Sunil Subramanium For West Indies Tour
BCCI Goes Back On Its Decision, Keeps Administrative Manager Sunil Subramanium For West Indies Tour
Advertisement