Hadlee and Holding say switch-hitting is unfair

Updated: 22 June 2008 17:30 IST

Two former fast bowlers, New Zealander Hadlee and West Indian Holding feel Pietersen's switch-hitting has raised issues relating to the spirit of cricket.

Hadlee and Holding say switch-hitting is unfair

London:

Two cricket greats, Sir Richard Hadlee and Michael Holding, feel that England batsman Kevin Pietersen has gained unfair advantage by switch-hitting Scott Styris for two sixes in England's victory over New Zealand in the One-Day International on Sunday.

Both former fast bowlers, New Zealander Hadlee and West Indian Holding feel that Pietersen's switch-hitting has raised the issues relating to the spirit of the game.

"It has created some serious issues in regards to the spirit of the game because the fielding side are dealing with a right-handed player and set the field accordingly," Hadlee said.

"The batsman has then changed that.

"If he is hit on the pad is he going to be treated as a left-hander or a right-hander?"

Hadlee has stated that there were technical issues with the game's rules, such as which of the batsman's stumps should be treated as his off stump and his leg stump, reports The Telegraph, London.

"Bowlers have to say which hand they are bowling with, so I don't see why batsmen should be allowed to change from right-handers to left-handers at a whim," Holding said.



Topics : Cricket Sreesanth
Related Articles
ICC Reason Behind Mohammad Asif Not Playing For Pakistan?
ICC Reason Behind Mohammad Asif Not Playing For Pakistan?
No Game Time For MS Dhoni Before First ODI vs England?
No Game Time For MS Dhoni Before First ODI vs England?
1st ODI: Steven Smith Ton Powers Australia to 68-Run Win Over New Zealand
1st ODI: Steven Smith Ton Powers Australia to 68-Run Win Over New Zealand
Show Comments
Advertisement